[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006011651580.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 16:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: run emergency remount on dedicated workqueue
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Please, always quote the patch title rather than a bare commit ID. The
> usual form is
>
> fa4b9074cd8428958c2adf9dc0c831f46e27c193 ("buffer: make
> invalidate_bdev() drain all percpu LRU add caches:)
>
> The main reason for this is so that people can more reliably and simply
> identify the patch within a different tree. I think.
Absolutely. Also, I think it's usually more readable to quote just the
first 12 hex digits of the SHA1 - that's still going to be perfectly
unique in any practical situation, and makes it way easier to flow the
text to be readable.
> gaah. Do we really want to add Yet Another Kernel Thread just for that
> dopey sysrq-U thing?
I do have to agree that it's disgusting. Can't we use an existing thread
(slow-work?) or something like that?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists