lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:46:17 +0300 From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu, npiggin@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mtosatti@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] use unfair spinlock when running on hypervisor. On 06/01/2010 08:39 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: >> We are running everything on NUMA (since all modern machines are now >> NUMA). At what scale do the issues become observable? >> > My 6-month-old laptop is NUMA? Comes as a surprise to me, and to the > perfectly-running NUMA=n kernel I'm running. > > Or did you mean a less broad phrase than "all modern machines"? > > All modern two socket and above boards, sorry. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists