linux-kernel - Nigel's current for-rafael queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1275481160-31150-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net>
Date:	Wed,  2 Jun 2010 22:18:59 +1000
From:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Nigel's current for-rafael queue

Hi all.

Here is my current patch queue.

Taken together, the patches implement the separation of low level
block i/o into a separate file, switch from using swap_map_pages
to extents stores prior to the 'header' page and implement fully
asynchronous (rather than batched I/O). I have only run it under
VMware so far, but would estimate a doubling in speed due to the
async i/o.

Looking at Jiri's patches, there is definitely some overlap, but
more in terms of lines in the code than direction of effort (with
the exception of separating swap out). He has covered areas for
improvement that I was going to do, just not yet.

Jiri, unless you object, I'm going to seek to apply your patches
on top of what I've done. Does that sound okay?

Nigel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/