[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100602150304.GA5326@barrios-desktop>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 00:03:04 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] oom: dump_tasks() use find_lock_task_mm() too
Hi, Kosaki.
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:51:49PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> dump_task() should have the same process iteration logic as
> select_bad_process().
>
> It is needed for protecting from task exiting race.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index cbad4d4..a8af9e8 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -344,35 +344,30 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned long *ppoints,
> */
> static void dump_tasks(const struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> {
> - struct task_struct *g, *p;
> + struct task_struct *p;
> + struct task_struct *task;
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "[ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss cpu oom_adj "
> "name\n");
> - do_each_thread(g, p) {
> +
> + for_each_process(p) {
> struct mm_struct *mm;
>
> - if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
> + if (is_global_init(p) || (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
select_bad_process needs is_global_init check to not select init as victim.
But in this case, it is just for dumping information of tasks.
> continue;
> - if (!thread_group_leader(p))
> + if (mem && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, mem))
> continue;
>
> - task_lock(p);
> - mm = p->mm;
> - if (!mm) {
> - /*
> - * total_vm and rss sizes do not exist for tasks with no
> - * mm so there's no need to report them; they can't be
> - * oom killed anyway.
> - */
Please, do not remove the comment for mm newbies unless you think it's useless.
> - task_unlock(p);
> + task = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> + if (!task)
> continue;
> - }
> +
> printk(KERN_INFO "[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %3d %3d %s\n",
> - p->pid, __task_cred(p)->uid, p->tgid, mm->total_vm,
> - get_mm_rss(mm), (int)task_cpu(p), p->signal->oom_adj,
> + task->pid, __task_cred(task)->uid, task->tgid, task->mm->total_vm,
> + get_mm_rss(task->mm), (int)task_cpu(task), task->signal->oom_adj,
> p->comm);
> - task_unlock(p);
> - } while_each_thread(g, p);
> + task_unlock(task);
> + }
> }
>
> static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> --
> 1.6.5.2
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists