linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] p54spi: replace internal "cx3110x" name with "p54spi"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201006021406.15393.luke@dashjr.org>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:06:05 -0500
From:	"Luke-Jr" <luke@...hjr.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54spi: replace internal "cx3110x" name with "p54spi"

On Wednesday 02 June 2010 02:54:59 am Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 21:16 -0500, Luke-Jr wrote:
> >  static struct spi_driver p54spi_driver = {
> >  	.driver = {
> > -		/* use cx3110x name because board-n800.c uses that for the
> > -		 * SPI port */
> > -		.name		= "cx3110x",
> > +		.name		= "p54spi",
> >  		.bus		= &spi_bus_type,
> 
> maybe that comment wasn't clear enough ... it needs to be that way to be
> properly linked up against SPI.

I don't understand what you mean here. Does the hardware-side of SPI use 
string identifiers? These are the only two instances of "cx3110x" in the 
kernel source; N8x0 board files expect "p54spi"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/