[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100602191336.GA5164@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:13:40 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hibernation hangs with ATA errors (lockup_detector bug)
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:44:59PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 06/01/2010 03:50 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 04:22:00PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> with -next I get the following errors while trying to hibernate in
> > >> qemu-kvm after the image is stored on disk:
> > >
> > > Is this the host that is hibernating or the guest?
> >
> > Guest.
> >
> > > KVM guests don't emulate the performance counters, so the nmi piece
> > > shouldn't be functioning and the soft lockup piece just sits on top of an
> > > hrtimer, so off the top of my head it is hard to imagine it intefering
> > > with a sata driver.
> > >
> > > I'll need your whole boot up log to see how the lockup detector
> > > initialized itself.
>
> Ok, so I found out what is causing the problem, not entirely sure why or
> what the right fix is, but this patch should do the trick.
>
> This is probably one of those fixing the symptoms but not the problem patch,
> but I don't know enough about suspend/resume to understand what the real
> problem is.
So the problem is that we stop the cpu hotplug notifying, I guess this prevents
some ata callbacks to execute in the cpu hotplug notifier and then provoke this
crash.
The patch looks ok, but I think you should at least print a message in such
case of watchdog failure.
Thanks.
>
> ---->SNIP<---------------------
> [lockup detector] don't return NOTIFY_BAD when cpu goes online for suspend
>
> KVM guests do not support performance counter emulation, so if the nmi
> watchdog piece is compiled in, it will always fail during boot. The
> failure returns NOTIFY_BAD when the cpu goes online in the cpu notifier
> callback. Returning NOTIFY_BAD causes hibernation to do really bad
> things, so avoid doing that.
>
> The cpu failure shouldn't be a critical failure anyway, so returning
> NOTIFY_BAD was probably overstating things.
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 6b7fad8..fda9770 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -550,8 +550,7 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> break;
> case CPU_ONLINE:
> case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> - if (watchdog_enable(hotcpu))
> - return NOTIFY_BAD;
> + watchdog_enable(hotcpu)
> break;
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists