linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: x86: use acpi flags for apic mapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100602194956.GB5264@lenovo>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:49:56 +0400
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	mjg@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: x86: use acpi flags for apic mapping

On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:29:27PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> ACPI FADT has entries to describe the apic mapping of a system.  Currently,
> these are ignored in the apic code.
> 
> Introduce apic_is_acpi_clustered_box() and read the FADT to determine
> if a box is clustered or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index 1fa03e0..4518683 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,14 @@ static inline int apic_is_clustered_box(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +enum apic_acpi_map_status {
> +	APIC_ACPI_BOTH,
> +	APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER,
> +	APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL,
> +	APIC_ACPI_NONE
> +};
> +extern enum apic_acpi_map_status apic_is_acpi_clustered_box(void);
> +
>  extern u8 setup_APIC_eilvt_mce(u8 vector, u8 msg_type, u8 mask);
>  extern u8 setup_APIC_eilvt_ibs(u8 vector, u8 msg_type, u8 mask);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index e5a4a1e..6ca346a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -2189,6 +2189,30 @@ static const __cpuinitconst struct dmi_system_id multi_dmi_table[] = {
>  	{}
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +enum apic_acpi_map_status apic_is_acpi_clustered_box(void)
> +{

It's a bit strange that function is "is" prefixed and returns not true or false
but enum, perhaps we may name it apic_acpi_dst_model() or something like
that?

> +	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID) {
> +		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL &&
> +		    acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_CLUSTER) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The rest of the code assumes physical flat
> +			 * in this case.
> +			 */
> +			return APIC_ACPI_BOTH;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_CLUSTER)
> +			return APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER;
> +
> +		if (acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL)
> +			return APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return APIC_ACPI_NONE;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static void __cpuinit dmi_check_multi(void)
>  {
>  	if (multi_checked)
> @@ -2208,6 +2232,20 @@ static void __cpuinit dmi_check_multi(void)
>   */
>  __cpuinit int apic_is_clustered_box(void)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +	switch (apic_is_acpi_clustered_box()) {
> +		case APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL:
> +		case APIC_ACPI_BOTH: /* assume physical flat in this case */
> +			return 0;
> +			break;
> +		case APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER:
> +			return 1;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			break;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>  	dmi_check_multi();
>  	if (multi)
>  		return 1;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
> index 09d3b17..80e291a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
> @@ -231,14 +231,32 @@ static int physflat_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  	/*
> -	 * Quirk: some x86_64 machines can only use physical APIC mode
> -	 * regardless of how many processors are present (x86_64 ES7000
> -	 * is an example).
> +	 * Some x86_64 machines can only use clustered or physical APIC
> +	 * mode regardless of how many processors are present.
>  	 */

Hmm, was it really needed to remove ES7000 from comment? Keep it here please.

> -	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision >= FADT2_REVISION_ID &&
> -		(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL)) {
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC only can use physical flat");
> -		return 1;
> +	switch (apic_is_acpi_clustered_box()) {
> +		case APIC_ACPI_BOTH:
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING FW_BUG "ACPI has set apic mode to "
> +			       "both clustered and physical flat.  Please "
> +			       "contact your firmware vendor for an update.\n");
> +			/*
> +			 * In this case assume physical flat as only a very
> +			 * limited number of systems use cluster
> +			 */
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC using physical flat\n");
> +			return 1;
> +			break;
> +		case APIC_ACPI_CLUSTER:
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC can only use cluster\n");
> +			return 0;
> +			break;
> +		case APIC_ACPI_PHYSICAL:
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG "system APIC can only use physical"
> +			       " flat\n");
> +			return 1;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			break;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!strncmp(oem_id, "IBM", 3) && !strncmp(oem_table_id, "EXA", 3)) {

	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/