[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006012129420.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 21:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brandon Philips <brandon@...p.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module
libcrc32c"
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > I would like to note that your original "fix things by dropping the lock"
> > patch that I hated so much had this exact bug too. Making this a good
> > example of _why_ it's basically always wrong to drop locks in the middle -
> > even if you claimed you knew and understood the locking.
>
> And I would like to note that it didn't :) It grabbed references only on
> completed modules.
Right you are, I misread the patch. You re-did the whole module lookup,
something that the original code didn't do. And yes, that should be safe.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists