[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C06C166.3050201@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:39:02 +0200
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used
index into ring itself
On 05/31/10 09:46, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
>> I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
>> I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
>> Posting for early flames/comments.
>
> Sorry, not without some evidence that it'll actually reduce cacheline
> bouncing. I *think* it will, but it's not obvious: the host may keep
> looking at avail_idx as we're updating last_seen. Or does qemu always
> look at both together anyway?
>
> Can someone convince me this is a win?
> Rusty.
Hi Rusty,
I ran some tests using the vring index publish patch with virtio_blk.
The numbers are based on running IOZone on a ramdisk passed to the guest
via virtio. While I didn't see any throughput improvements, I saw a
20-30% reduction in the VMExit count for the full run. This was measured
grabbing the VMExit count prior and after the run and calculating the
difference.
I have the numbers in a PDF, so I will email it to you in private as I
don't like sending PDFs to the mailing list. However if anybody else
wants the numbers feel free to ping me off list and I'll forward them.
Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists