linux-kernel - Re: Pull request for nanoengine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100602163844.509e9953.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:38:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@...uc.puc-rio.br>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	mad_soft@...ox.ru, rpjday@...shcourse.ca,
	jaswinderrajput@...il.com, kristoffer.ericson@...il.com,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: Pull request for nanoengine

On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:19:01 -0300
Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@...uc.puc-rio.br> wrote:

> The following is a compilation of all the patches I have done for the
> nanoengine. Some of these are also valid for SA11xx based machines
> like, e.g, sharp Zaurus.

Which other kernel developer were you hoping would merge this tree?

>  arch/arm/configs/nanoengine_defconfig          | 1396 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Kconfig                   |    8 +
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/Makefile                  |    2 +
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1100.c              |   56 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/cpu-sa1110.c              |   51 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/nanoengine.h |   30 +
>  arch/arm/mach-sa1100/nanoengine.c              |  115 ++
>  drivers/pcmcia/Makefile                        |    3 +-
>  drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c                |    3 +
>  drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.h                |    1 +
>  drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_nanoengine.c             |  219 ++++
>  drivers/pcmcia/soc_common.c                    |  129 ++-
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c                       |  153 ++-

I can only think it must have been Russell.

I've rather lost track of what's happening with ARM subtrees.  I
_think_ it's now the case the relevant maintainers are putting their
trees into linux-next directly and are asking Linus to pull them
directly.  But maybe that's a misconception.

Can someone please explain the current state of play?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/