linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100602051403.GA5784@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jun 2010 15:14:03 +1000
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agk@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] DM-CRYPT: Scale to multiple CPUs

On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:10:00AM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> And how can I use pcrypt for dm-crypt? After a quick look at pcrypt 
> sources, it seems to be dependent on aead and not useable for general 
> encryption algorithms at all.

You instantiate a pcrypt variant of whatever algorithm that you're
using.  For example, if you're using XTS then you should instantiate
pcrypt(xts(aes)).  Currently you must use tcrypt to instantiate.

> I tried cryptd --- in theory it should work by requesting the algorithm 
> like cryptd(cbc(aes)) --- but if I replace "%s(%s)" with "cryptd(%s(%s))" 
> in dm-crypt sources it locks up and doesn't work.

cryptd is something else altogether.  However, it certainly should
not lock up.  What kernel version is this?

> > This would be inappropriate for upper layer code as they do not
> > know whether the underlying algorithm should be parallelised,
> > e.g., a PCI offload board certainly should not be parallelised.
> 
> The upper layer should ideally request "cbc(aes)" and the crypto routine 
> should select the most efficient implementation --- sync on single-core 
> system, async with cryptd on multi-core system and async with hardware 
> implementation if you have HIFN crypto card.

That's exactly what will happen when the admin instantiates pcrypt.
dm-crypt simply needs to specify cbc(aes) and it will get pcrypt
automatically.

The point is that on a modern processor like Nehalem you don't need
pcrypt.
 
> It is pointless to track the submitting CPU.

No you are wrong.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/