[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006030452.o534qPZa022225@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:52:25 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: hpa@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86, cpufeature: Suppress compiler warning with gcc 3.x
Gcc 3.x generates a warning
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h: In function `__static_cpu_has':
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:315: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints
on each file.
But static_cpu_has() for gcc 3.x does not need __static_cpu_has().
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-2.6.35-rc1.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ linux-2.6.35-rc1/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flag
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
+#if __GNUC__ >= 4
/*
* Static testing of CPU features. Used the same as boot_cpu_has().
* These are only valid after alternatives have run, but will statically
@@ -332,7 +333,6 @@ static __always_inline __pure bool __sta
#endif
}
-#if __GNUC__ >= 4
#define static_cpu_has(bit) \
( \
__builtin_constant_p(boot_cpu_has(bit)) ? \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists