[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275549226.27810.34762.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:13:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree: undo augmented damage -v2
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:11 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> P SL
> / \ / \
> N S ---> N S
> / / \ / \
> C SL SR C SR
>
> If P needs to be removed, we need to re-augment S also in this case,
> right? It looks like we are not handling this case.
rb_augment_erase_begin(P) will return S if I read the code right, so
rb_augment_path(S) will the re-augment S, SL, N.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists