[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275551449.27810.34905.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:50:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, williams@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] oom-kill: give the dying task a higher priority
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:11 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> And that can reduce the runtime of the thread holding a writelock on
> mm->mmap_sem, making the exit actually take longer than without the patch
> if its priority is significantly higher, especially on smaller machines.
/me smells an inversion... on -rt we solved those ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists