[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275527275.15884.26.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:07:55 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] BKL: remove the BKL from kernel init code
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 02:13 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I have shown by code review that no driver takes
> the BKL at init time any more, so whatever the
> init code was locking against is no longer there
> and it is now safe to remove the BKL there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> init/main.c | 5 -----
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 8 --------
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 3bdb152..81821e1 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,6 @@ static noinline void __init_refok rest_init(void)
> rcu_read_lock();
> kthreadd_task = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> - unlock_kernel();
>
> /*
> * The boot idle thread must execute schedule()
> @@ -555,7 +554,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void)
> * Interrupts are still disabled. Do necessary setups, then
> * enable them
> */
> - lock_kernel();
> tick_init();
> boot_cpu_init();
> page_address_init();
> @@ -819,7 +817,6 @@ static noinline int init_post(void)
> /* need to finish all async __init code before freeing the memory */
> async_synchronize_full();
> free_initmem();
> - unlock_kernel();
> mark_rodata_ro();
> system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
> numa_default_policy();
> @@ -855,8 +852,6 @@ static noinline int init_post(void)
>
> static int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
> {
> - lock_kernel();
> -
> /*
> * init can allocate pages on any node
> */
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 086d363..8047ca5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -734,13 +734,6 @@ __acquires(kernel_lock)
> return -1;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * When this gets called we hold the BKL which means that
> - * preemption is disabled. Various trace selftests however
> - * need to disable and enable preemption for successful tests.
> - * So we drop the BKL here and grab it after the tests again.
> - */
> - unlock_kernel();
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
> mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
>
> tracing_selftest_running = true;
> @@ -822,7 +815,6 @@ __acquires(kernel_lock)
> #endif
>
> out_unlock:
> - lock_kernel();
> return ret;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists