[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275572563.2456.37.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:42:43 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] fcntl: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user fails
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 à 22:24 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa a écrit :
> (2010/06/03 22:10), Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:38:03PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> This is really ugly.
> >>
> >> static inline int sec_copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3)
> >> {
> >> int res = copy_to_user(arg1, arg2, arg3);
> >>
> >> return (res> 0) ? -EFAULT : res;
> >> }
> >
> > It would be unfortunate if it adds more confusion. I'd prefer to have
> > a sufficiently different name. memcpy_to_user/memcpy_from_user
> > perhaps?
>
> Then, and memclear_user() ?
>
> >
>
We are interested by the fact that full copy is done, so maybe use the
'full' prefix ?
fullcopy_to_user() , fullclear_user() ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists