[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100603140357.GB3548@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:03:57 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: Make coredump interruptible
On 06/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 06/02, Roland McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > when select_bad_process() finds the task P to kill it can participate
> > > in the core dump (sleep in exit_mm), but we should somehow inform the
> > > thread which actually dumps the core: P->mm->core_state->dumper.
> >
> > Perhaps it should simply do that: if you would choose P to oom-kill, and
> > P->mm->core_state!=NULL, then choose P->mm->core_state->dumper instead.
>
> ... to set TIF_MEMDIE which should be checked in elf_core_dump().
>
> Probably yes.
Well, nothing can protect mm->core_state, the dumper owns it. Of course
we can add the locking, but this is not nice.
And again, perhaps MMF_OOMKILLED can be useful anyway.
So, I think this would be the most quick/simple fix for now.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists