[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C070CB4.2030304@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:00:20 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]X86:reboot.c Add some dmi entries to pci_reboot_dmi_table.
On 06/02/2010 06:47 PM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Matthew Garrett<mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:27:22PM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>> On 06/02/2010 05:20 PM, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>>> #include<unistd.h>
>>>>
>>>> int main() {
>>>> iopl(3);
>>>> outb(2, 0xcf9);
>>>> sleep(1);
>>>> outb(6, 0xcf9);
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> That's basically what PCI reboot does.
>>>
>>> the above code reboot's the machine as it should..
>>> I can look at that(need to take a break first though)
>>> and see..
>>
>> That's pretty infuriating. The ACPI-provided definition doesn't work,
>> and there's no ACPI mechanism for expressing the more complex cf9
>> behaviour. Windows doesn't appear to special case this, so we're
>> probably left trying to figure out why the keyboard controller method
>> doesn't work. Sigh.
>
> Do these Macs even have a PC keyboard controller? A recent thread on
> PS/2 keyboard/mouse controller probing suggests they may not..
>
> Justin, what happens if you try the simple outb(6, 0xcf9) test program
> multiple times, does that do anything?
>
this reboots the system
int main() {
iopl(3);
outb(6, 0xcf9);
return 0;
}
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists