linux-kernel - Re: ARM defconfig files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files

On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Russell King wrote:
> 
> I already covered that in my (ignored) email where I brought up a
> "STD_CONFIG" config symbol, which could be disabled to turn off all
> these additional "select"s.

I apparently haven't explained myself enough, because what you keep on 
harping on is not something I consider acceptable.

STD_CONFIG is pointless. It's pointless because the solution to what 
you call STD_CONFIG would be to just NOT USING the special Kconfig.xyz 
file at all.

So when I suggest special Kconfig files, they are meant to just generate 
the templates - ie they'd _generate_ what is currently the defconfig 
files. You wouldn't _have_ to use them at all.

If you _had_ to use them, you'd lose the flexibility of Kconfig and asking 
questions. 

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/