[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275600737.2091.32332.camel@rchatre-DESK>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:32:17 -0700
From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Satish Eerpini <eerpini@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iwl3945 bug in 2.6.34
Hi Satish,
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 16:29 -0700, reinette chatre wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 15:08 -0700, reinette chatre wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 11:33 -0700, reinette chatre wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 23:25 -0700, Satish Eerpini wrote:
> > >
> > > > No probe response from AP 00:1b:da:2a:a1:53 after 500ms, disconnecting.
> > > > iwl3945 0000:10:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms.
> > > > iwl3945 0000:10:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110).
> > > > iwl3945 0000:10:00.0: Error sending REPLY_RXON: time out after 500ms.
> > > > iwl3945 0000:10:00.0: Error setting new configuration (-110).
> > >
> > > This did not use to be an issue with 3945 and unfortunately we do not
> > > know what is triggering it now. Please try the "Enable stuck queue
> > > detection on 3945" patch that is attached to
> > > http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1834 as a
> > > workaround.
> >
> > Actually, sorry, but that patch will not work on 2.6.34 since the
> > feature it enables is not present there - it will be in 2.6.35 though.
> > To enable the feature in 2.6.34 will take some more backporting effort
> > that I'm looking into now.
>
> Please try the attached two patches.
Were you able to test these patches?
Thanks
Reinette
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists