[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275601717.23384.168.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:48:37 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 13:31 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> and now you'd be able to basically generate a OMAP3EVM .config file by
> just running "allnoconfig" on that Kconfig.omap3_evm file. But it would
> only have to select the parts that are specific for the EVM platform,
> because the generic OMAP3 support would be picked by the Kconfig.omap3
> file, which in turn would not have to worry about the generic ARM parts
> etc.
>
> See?
We could just alias commands so when the user runs
"make ARCH=arm omap3_evm_defconfig"
it would just do whatever this command does ,
"KBUILD_KCONFIG=arch/arm/configs/Kconfig.omap3_evm make allnoconfig"
but those Kconfigs wouldn't be in "make menuconfig" it would just exist
to generate the defconfigs, or the .config .. So Kconfig.omap3_evm
basically becomes the defconfig.
That doesn't seem un-reasonable. Although the solver to me seems more
elegant and we're getting the solver for some other reasons it seems
(unrelated to this defconfig issue).
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists