[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100603153016.cbe6ff0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:30:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@...et.gr.jp>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] panic: keep blinking in spite of long spin timer
mode
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:01:16 +0900
TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@...et.gr.jp> wrote:
> To keep panic_timeout accuracy when running under a hypervisor, the
> current implementation only spins on long time (1 second) calls to
> mdelay. That brings a good effect, but the problem is the keyboard
> LEDs don't blink at all on that situation.
>
> This patch changes to call to panic_blink_enter() between every mdelay
> and keeps blinking in spite of long spin timer mode.
>
> The default time to call to mdelay is 1ms. If the speed of blinking
> is slow enough, the time to call to mdelay will be automatically
> switched to longer. This is suitable when running under a hypervisor.
>
> ...
>
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 +-
> arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-gta02.c | 17 +----
> drivers/input/serio/i8042.c | 25 +-------
> include/linux/kernel.h | 2
> kernel/panic.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++---------
> 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
It cleans up the led-blinking implementations nicely. That's good.
>
> ...
>
> + panicblink= [KNL] The speed of panic blink (default is 12 wpm)
> + The period of panic blink can be computed by the
> + formula T = 7200 / W, where T is the period in milli-
> + seconds, W is the speed in wpm (words per minute).
> + Should be 5 or less when running under a hypervisor
Nobody will know what "wpm" means. What is a "word" in this context?
Unclear.
How about "bpm": "blinks per minute". That's nice and direct.
>
> ...
>
>
> + if (panic_blink_wpm <= 0 || panic_blink_wpm > 100)
> + panic_blink_wpm = 12;
hm, OK. Or we could do
if (panic_blink_wpm <= 0)
panic_blink_wpm = 1;
if (panic_blink_wpm > 100)
panic_blink_wpm = 100;
which is handily encapsulated in the clamp() macro which nobody uses.
> + if (!panic_blink)
> + panic_blink = no_blink;
Can we initialise panic_blink to no_blink at compile-time then remove this?
>
> ...
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists