[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006031833360.24526@xanadu.home>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:45:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARM defconfig files
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> [100603 21:07]:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 07:46:23PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Compiling in multiple ARM platforms is trickier, we would have to get
> > > rid of the duplicate defines like NR_IRQS, then have some common clock
> > > framework etc. Then figure out some way to get rid of Makefile.boot.
> > > Russell probably has some other things in mind that would have to be
> > > changed to make this happen.
> >
> > - Find someway to handle the wide variety of interrupt controllers.
Eric Miao posted a patch series for that already.
> > - Be able to handle any multitude of V:P translations, including non-linear
> > alongside linear transations.
Some effort is being deployed at my $job to do that. Initially only the
linear translation will be supported, which should cover the vast
majority of the cases already. The odd targets will simply require a
build of their own like it is done today.
> > - Different PAGE_OFFSETs
Again, a majority of targets may simply share the default one.
> > - Different kernel VM layouts allowing for a variety of different ioremap
> > region sizes
VMALLOC_END should only need to become a per machine class variable
initialized at run time.
> Some of these could be handled by allowing building a seprate instance
> for each platform compiled in. Maybe we could set them up with symlinks.
We already have runtime selectable machine instances. Building multiple
machine class could extend on that.
> How about a minimal generic relocatable ARM kernel and then we load the
> platform support as a module from ramdisk? :)
Pity... Nah.
> > and so the list goes on...
>
> Yeah..
Like I said, there is an effort to gradually overcome those issues one
by one.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists