linux-kernel - perf: tools/perf/design.txt is badly out of date

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C083D2C.5070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:39:24 -0700
From:	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: perf: tools/perf/design.txt is badly out of date

I had a glance at tools/perf/design.txt the other day, and it
appears to be pretty far out of date.

Is design.txt a document that you want to keep the current way for
historical reasons [and the up-to-date documentation placed somewhere
else], or one that should be maintained?

I'm wondering if some/all of this documentation should move into
include/linux/perf_event.h

- Corey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/