linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] memcg make move_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100603115119.be29ec13.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:51:19 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] memcg make move_task_charge check clearer

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>

Now, for checking a memcg is under task-account-moving, we do css_tryget()
against mc.to and mc.from. But this is just complicating things. This patch
makes the check easier.

This patch adds a spinlock to move_charge_struct and guard modification
of mc.to and mc.from. By this, we don't have to think about complicated
races around this not-critical path.

Changelog:
 - removed disable/enable irq.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Index: mmotm-2.6.34-May21/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.34-May21.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.34-May21/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ enum move_type {
 
 /* "mc" and its members are protected by cgroup_mutex */
 static struct move_charge_struct {
+	spinlock_t	  lock; /* for from, to, moving_task */
 	struct mem_cgroup *from;
 	struct mem_cgroup *to;
 	unsigned long precharge;
@@ -276,6 +277,7 @@ static struct move_charge_struct {
 	struct task_struct *moving_task;	/* a task moving charges */
 	wait_queue_head_t waitq;		/* a waitq for other context */
 } mc = {
+	.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(mc.lock),
 	.waitq = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(mc.waitq),
 };
 
@@ -1076,26 +1078,25 @@ static unsigned int get_swappiness(struc
 
 static bool mem_cgroup_under_move(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
 {
-	struct mem_cgroup *from = mc.from;
-	struct mem_cgroup *to = mc.to;
+	struct mem_cgroup *from;
+	struct mem_cgroup *to;
 	bool ret = false;
-
-	if (from == mem || to == mem)
-		return true;
-
-	if (!from || !to || !mem->use_hierarchy)
-		return false;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	if (css_tryget(&from->css)) {
-		ret = css_is_ancestor(&from->css, &mem->css);
-		css_put(&from->css);
-	}
-	if (!ret && css_tryget(&to->css)) {
-		ret = css_is_ancestor(&to->css,	&mem->css);
+	/*
+	 * Unlike task_move routines, we access mc.to, mc.from not under
+	 * mutual exclusion by cgroup_mutex. Here, we take spinlock instead.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&mc.lock);
+	from = mc.from;
+	to = mc.to;
+	if (!from)
+		goto unlock;
+	if (from == mem || to == mem
+	    || (mem->use_hierarchy && css_is_ancestor(&from->css, &mem->css))
+	    || (mem->use_hierarchy && css_is_ancestor(&to->css,	&mem->css)))
 		css_put(&to->css);
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+		ret = true;
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -4447,11 +4448,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_precharge_mc(struc
 
 static void mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
 {
+	struct mem_cgroup *from = mc.from;
+	struct mem_cgroup *to = mc.to;
+
 	/* we must uncharge all the leftover precharges from mc.to */
 	if (mc.precharge) {
 		__mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(mc.to, mc.precharge);
 		mc.precharge = 0;
-		memcg_oom_recover(mc.to);
 	}
 	/*
 	 * we didn't uncharge from mc.from at mem_cgroup_move_account(), so
@@ -4460,7 +4463,6 @@ static void mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
 	if (mc.moved_charge) {
 		__mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(mc.from, mc.moved_charge);
 		mc.moved_charge = 0;
-		memcg_oom_recover(mc.from);
 	}
 	/* we must fixup refcnts and charges */
 	if (mc.moved_swap) {
@@ -4485,9 +4487,13 @@ static void mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
 
 		mc.moved_swap = 0;
 	}
+	spin_lock(&mc.lock);
 	mc.from = NULL;
 	mc.to = NULL;
 	mc.moving_task = NULL;
+	spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
+	memcg_oom_recover(from);
+	memcg_oom_recover(to);
 	wake_up_all(&mc.waitq);
 }
 
@@ -4516,12 +4522,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct 
 			VM_BUG_ON(mc.moved_charge);
 			VM_BUG_ON(mc.moved_swap);
 			VM_BUG_ON(mc.moving_task);
+			spin_lock(&mc.lock);
 			mc.from = from;
 			mc.to = mem;
 			mc.precharge = 0;
 			mc.moved_charge = 0;
 			mc.moved_swap = 0;
 			mc.moving_task = current;
+			spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
 
 			ret = mem_cgroup_precharge_mc(mm);
 			if (ret)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/