lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ee1bf4f9c158983acad0a4548229586128afad67@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:11:25 -0700
From:	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
To:	<mingo@...e.hu>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>, <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	<lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events

[Changes from v2:

Use hotcpu_notifier - fix will only apply to hotplug events, not
initial SMP boot

Kerneldocify function arguments

Use acquire_console_sem() instead of try_acquire_console_sem()

Reuse the existing disable_boot_consoles() initcall instead of making a
new one]

When a secondary CPU is being brought up, it is not uncommon for
printk() to be invoked when cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) == 0.  The
case that I witnessed personally was on MIPS:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/30/4

If (can_use_console() == 0), printk() will spool its output to log_buf
and it will be visible in "dmesg", but that output will NOT be echoed to
the console until somebody calls release_console_sem() from a CPU that
is online.  Therefore, the boot time messages from the new CPU can get
stuck in "limbo" for a long time, and might suddenly appear on the
screen when a completely unrelated event (e.g. "eth0: link is down")
occurs.

This patch modifies the console code so that any pending messages are
automatically flushed out to the console whenever a CPU hotplug
operation completes successfully or aborts.

The issue was seen on 2.6.34.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
---
 kernel/printk.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk.c b/kernel/printk.c
index 444b770..1748519 100644
--- a/kernel/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
 #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include <linux/kmsg_dump.h>
 #include <linux/syslog.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/notifier.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
@@ -985,6 +987,33 @@ void resume_console(void)
 }
 
 /**
+ * console_cpu_notify - print deferred console messages after CPU hotplug
+ * @self: notifier struct
+ * @action: CPU hotplug event
+ * @hcpu: unused
+ *
+ * If printk() is called from a CPU that is not online yet, the messages
+ * will be spooled but will not show up on the console.  This function is
+ * called when a new CPU comes online (or fails to come up), and ensures
+ * that any such output gets printed.
+ */
+static int __cpuinit console_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
+	unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
+{
+	switch (action) {
+	case CPU_ONLINE:
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
+		acquire_console_sem();
+		release_console_sem();
+	}
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata console_nb = {
+	.notifier_call		= console_cpu_notify,
+};
+
+/**
  * acquire_console_sem - lock the console system for exclusive use.
  *
  * Acquires a semaphore which guarantees that the caller has
@@ -1371,7 +1400,7 @@ int unregister_console(struct console *console)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_console);
 
-static int __init disable_boot_consoles(void)
+static int __init printk_late_init(void)
 {
 	struct console *con;
 
@@ -1382,9 +1411,10 @@ static int __init disable_boot_consoles(void)
 			unregister_console(con);
 		}
 	}
+	register_hotcpu_notifier(&console_nb);
 	return 0;
 }
-late_initcall(disable_boot_consoles);
+late_initcall(printk_late_init);
 
 #if defined CONFIG_PRINTK
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ