linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.35] tracing/events: Convert format output to seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C0896C9.1000708@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 04 Jun 2010 14:01:45 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	rostedt@...dmis.org
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Kei Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@...fujitsu.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Tomohiro Kusumi <kusumi.tomohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][GIT PULL][v2.6.35] tracing/events: Convert format output
 to seq_file

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 09:39 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> 
>> This patch seriously conflicts with my patch that extracts common fields
>> from every trace event to a global list, which is already in your perf/core2
>> branch. Should I rebase and resend it?
> 
> I pushed out a conflict resolution of pulling tip/perf/urgent-2 into
> tip/perf/core-2 (and pushing that as tip/perf/core-4).
> 
> I did change a bit.
> 

The code looks ok.

But we can simplify the seqfile code based on the fact that the common
fields has been in a global list. I can make an incremental patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/