[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877hmfib2w.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:38:39 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adilger@....com,
corbet@....net, serue@...ibm.com, neilb@...e.de,
hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, bfields@...ldses.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ibm.com,
philippe.deniel@....FR, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V13 0/11] Generic name to handle and open by handle syscalls
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:43:28 +1000, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:44:06PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The below set of patches implement open by handle support using exportfs
> > operations. This allows user space application to map a file name to file
> > handle and later open the file using handle. This should be usable
> > for userspace NFS [1] and 9P server [2]. XFS already support this with the ioctls
> > XFS_IOC_PATH_TO_HANDLE and XFS_IOC_OPEN_BY_HANDLE.
> .....
> > Example program: (x86_32). (x86_64 would need a different syscall number)
>
> [snip test program]
>
> Just a thought - can you write a set of tests using this (or
> similar) test program and integrate them into xfstests?
>
> That will help ensure correctness when implementing the API in other
> filesystems (e.g. XFS ;), as well as provide some level of assurance
> that we'll notice when we break the code...
>
Will do. I also have test that test for different open flags with
open_by_handle_at. Will add those tests also.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists