[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1006041052450.1003@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:57:51 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Shaz <shazalive@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
securityengineeringresearchgroup
<securityengineeringresearchgroup@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] EVM
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> SELinux, Smack, Capabilities, and IMA all use extended attributes. The
> purpose of EVM is to detect offline tampering of these security extended
> attributes.
One issue mentioned to me off-list is that if EVM is only protecting
against offline attacks, why not just encrypt the entire volume ?
This would provide confidentiality and integrity protection for all data
and metadata, rather than just integrity for xattr metadata.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists