[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C08AEA5.1050406@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:43:33 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 2/4] sched: adjust when cpu_active and cpuset
configurations are updated during cpu on/offlining
On 06/02/2010 06:03 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Okay, how about this one? Using notifiers seems better for the
> following reasons.
>
> * Rollback on failure.
>
> * cpuset/sched_domain don't expect to be called before smp
> configuration is complete. If hardcoded into cpu_up/down(),
> condition checks need to be added so that they're skipped if the
> system is bringing up the cpus for the first time.
>
> Works fine here w/ CPUSET enabled and disabled.
Ping. Peter.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists