[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275646103.27810.39526.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:08:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: tytso@....edu, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Arve Hj?nnev?g <arve@...roid.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: suspend blockers & Android integration
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 12:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > The only 'interesting' issue I can see here is that if you create 1000
> > CLOCK_MONOTONIC namepaces, we'd need to have a tree of trees in order to
> > efficiently find the leftmost timer.
>
> Realistically Android userspace would create just a single such namespace for
> all the untrusted/unknown/uncontrolled apps, right?
Possibly, yeah.
But it might not stop someone else from create an insane amount of them.
So we do need to deal with that, and a linear loop over all timer bases,
which then will be a user controlled quantity, just doesn't sound
right :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists