[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mxvax3on.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:39:20 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] fs: cleanup files_lock
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> writes:
>
> Again, this would be nice, but I didn't see an easy way to do it.
> Even if refcounting obsoleted may_remount_ro, we still have
> mark_files_ro. It's no more complex to rip this all out after my
> patch. I don't see the problem in doing this patch. It has good
> numbers.
Yes agreed. The global lock is currently really painful on workloads
that do a lot of opens and anything to make this better would be good asap.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists