lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100604162332.GF3414@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:23:32 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc:	Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@...ibm.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, lsf10-pc@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [LFS/VM TOPIC] Stable pages while IO (was Wrong DIF guard tag
 on ext2 write)

On Thu 03-06-10 19:09:52, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> [Topic]
> How to not let pages change while in IO
> 
> [Abstract]
> As seen in a long thread on the fsdvel scsi mailing lists. Lots of
> people have headaches and sleep less nights because individual pages
> can change while in IO and/or DMA. Though each one as slightly different
> needs, the mechanics look to be the same.
  Hmm, I don't think it's really about "how to not let pages change" - that
is doable by using wait_on_page_writeback() in ->page_mkwrite and
->write_begin. I think the discussion is more about whether we should do it
or whether we should rechecksum and resubmit IO in case of checksum failure
as Nick proposed...

								Honza
> People that care:
> - Mirror and RAID people that need on disk consistency.
> - Network storage that wants data checksum.
> - DIF/DIX people
> - ...
> 
> I for one know nothing of the subject but am a RAID person and would
> like a solution that does not force me to copy the complete data load.
> 
> Please lets get all the VM VFS and drivers people in one room and see
> if we can have a Linux solution to this problem
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ