[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C09337E.3070504@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:10:22 -0700
From: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: perf: tools/perf/design.txt is badly out of date
Maybe the file should at least move to the normal burial ground for docs, Documentation, rather than where it is today tools/perf. Perhaps there it would be easier for people to find and correct.
On 6/4/2010 2:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:39 -0700, Corey Ashford wrote:
>> I had a glance at tools/perf/design.txt the other day, and it
>> appears to be pretty far out of date.
>>
>> Is design.txt a document that you want to keep the current way for
>> historical reasons [and the up-to-date documentation placed somewhere
>> else], or one that should be maintained?
>>
>> I'm wondering if some/all of this documentation should move into
>> include/linux/perf_event.h
>
> Its the ineffiteble fate of everything Documentation/ to be out-dated.
> But yeah, that file will be woefully inaccurate by now.
>
> Yeah, I think making perf_event.h more explanatory would be good. But I
> don't think we want to go overboard there either, if comments get too
> large and unwieldy they tend to bitrot just as hard as Documentation/
>
>
--
Regards,
- Corey
Corey Ashford
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center, Linux Toolchain
Beaverton, OR
503-578-3507
cjashfor@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists