[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D530114C3DC47@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:46:49 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: Tree for June 3
> What does a NaT consumption fault mean, and does it give the invalid
> address it was loaded off?
This almost always means that we dereferenced a NULL pointer ... though
any access into the bottom PAGE_SIZE of kernel virtual address space
will result in this trap. This happens on ia64 because we have a "NaT"
page mapped at 0x0 so that speculative loads that chase NULL pointers
at the end of lists behave more rationally.
Sadly I don't have the actual address. The register that was used
for the dereference isn't included in the OOPS output.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists