linux-kernel - RE: linux-next: Tree for June 3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006041548480.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: Tree for June 3

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Luck, Tony wrote:
> 
> It gets rid of the oops. So that's good.  Something is still
> hokey in linux-next land though because no modules get loaded.
> So no ehci/uhci available :-(

So maybe the error (the one that caused us to exit and caused the oops due 
to the wrong return value) is the one that now causes it to not load.

I note that ia64 has a pretty big/complex module_frob_arch_sections(). 
Many architectures (like x86) has a trivial one ("return 0;"), and there 
might be some ordering differences in the setup that only matter with 
architectures that do odd things there..

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/