linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2010-06-03-16-36 uploaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100604111434N.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jun 2010 11:16:15 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linville@...driver.com, mb@...sch.de
Subject: Re: mmotm 2010-06-03-16-36 uploaded

On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 18:34:10 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:14:27 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:36:51 -0700
> > akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > 
> > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2010-06-03-16-36 has been uploaded to
> > > 
> > >    http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> > > 
> > > and will soon be available at
> > > 
> > >    git://zen-kernel.org/kernel/mmotm.git
> > > 
> > > It contains the following patches against 2.6.35-rc1:
> > 
> > (snip)
> > 
> > > ssb-add-dma_dev-to-ssb_device-structure.patch
> > > b43legacy-replace-the-ssb_dma-api-with-the-generic-dma-api.patch
> > > b43-replace-the-ssb_dma-api-with-the-generic-dma-api.patch
> > > b44-replace-the-ssb_dma-api-with-the-generic-dma-api.patch
> > > ssb-remove-the-ssb-dma-api.patch
> > 
> > Is there any reason why the above patches are still in -mm (i.e. not
> > merged in the previous merge window)?
> 
> Two lines earlier:
> 
> # propagate these:
> 
> is akpm shorthand for "send these through maintainers".
> 
> I prefer to go that way if the patch isn't urgent, just to get a bit
> more attention and review.  If the patch has a maintainer ack already
> then I'll often merge it directly.
> 
> > I got an ACK on the first patch to ssb core from the ssb maintainer,
> > ACKs on the second and third to b43legacy and b43 from the maintainer.
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?t=126621151900002&r=1&w=2
> 
> And none of the above patches were sent to me with acked-by:s, and
> nobody sent new acked-by:s, so I didn't know this!

Oh, sorry.

> I guess John is the conduit for all five of the above so I'll send them
> to him now and he might decide to squeak them into 2.6.35.

Thanks. They aren't urgent. 2.6.26 is fine.


> But before I do that, please send me an email telling me who acked each
> patch and I'll update that info.

The first version included the first, second, third, and forth
patches' changes:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=126621140418564&w=2

Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> acked:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126623288409638&w=2

David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> also acked:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=126621509421648&w=2

Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> acked the changes to
b43legacy and b43 (the second and third patches now):
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126634755930224&w=2


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/