[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilb7---Qg1oLwzanKP1RGe04fkAXDtZzz0w9MGz@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 15:56:01 +0200
From: Esben Haabendal <esbenhaabendal@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Esben Haabendal <eha@...edevelopment.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...terjones.org, mingo@...e.hu,
joachim.eastwood@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: support IRQ_NESTED_THREAD with non-threaded
interrupt handlers
I have a board with an I2C PCA9535 chip with two PHY interrupt lines
hooked up to. The pca953x driver calls set_irq_nested_thread on all
irq's on initialization. The PHY driver then calls request_irq, and has
no idea that it should actually be using a threaded handler.
With this patch, the PHY driver is able to work in this scenario
without changes (and so should any other driver using request_irq).
/Esben
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>
>> set_irq_nested_thread() might be called by interrupt controller to
>> supported nested irq thread handling, and with this change, drivers
>> with non-threaded irq handlers can still use the irqs.
>
> What's the problem you are trying to solve ? The above changelog is
> not very useful ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <eha@...edevelopment.dk>
>> ---
>> kernel/irq/chip.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> kernel/irq/manage.c | 4 +---
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
>> index b7091d5..8202993 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
>> @@ -405,7 +405,14 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
>> desc->status |= IRQ_INPROGRESS;
>> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
>>
>> - action_ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
>> + if (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD && action->thread_fn)
>> + action_ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
>> + else {
>> + local_irq_disable();
>> + action_ret = action->handler(action->irq, action->dev_id);
>> + local_irq_enable();
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!noirqdebug)
>> note_interrupt(irq, desc, action_ret);
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
>> index 3164ba7..e7bca04 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
>> @@ -681,10 +681,8 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
>> * Check whether the interrupt nests into another interrupt
>> * thread.
>> */
>> - nested = desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD;
>> + nested = (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD) && new->thread_fn;
>> if (nested) {
>> - if (!new->thread_fn)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> /*
>> * Replace the primary handler which was provided from
>> * the driver for non nested interrupt handling by the
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Esben Haabendal, Senior Software Consultant
DoréDevelopment ApS, Ved Stranden 1, 9560 Hadsund, DK-Denmark
Phone: +45 51 92 53 93, E-mail: eha@...edevelopment.dk
WWW: http://www.doredevelopment.dk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists