linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:51:30 +0300
From:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	TuxOnIce-devel <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm 
 for	reading & writing a hibernation image.

On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 21:04 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: 
> On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 15:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: 
> > > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> ...
> > > So how TuxOnIce helps here?
> > Very simple.
> > 
> > With swsusp, I can save 750MB (memory) + 250 Vram (vram)
> > With full memory save I can save (1750 MB of memory) + 250 MB of
> > vram....
> 
> So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB
> (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)?  Would it
> be _that_ _much_ worse?

That I agree with you.

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/