[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:19:08 +0200
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, tytso@....edu,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
2010/6/6 <david@...g.hm>:
> as an example (taken from this thread).
>
> system A needs to wake up to get a battery reading, store it and go back to
> sleep, It does so every 10 seconds. But when it does so it only runs the one
> process and then goes back to sleep.
>
> system B has the same need, but wakes up every 10 minutes. but when it does
> so it fully wakes up and this allows the mail app to power up the radio,
> connect to the Internet and start checking for new mail before oppurtunistic
> sleep shuts things down (causing the mail check to fail)
>
> System A will last considerably longer on a battery than System B.
Exactly, thanks for pointing out the specific example :)
~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists