[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:46:01 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg
<arve@...roid.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
tytso@....edu, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:00:47 +0200
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com> wrote:
> Even worse, the suspend wakelock will keep the
> whole kernel active, as opposed to powering off unused devices
> separately as it's done in runtime PM.
That is not true. While the kernel is not suspended it does
runtime pm.
> > Users do like that to work too -- I recall Arve leaving a device in
> > his filing cabinet with the radio off while he was out of the country
> > for three weeks once, and him discovering it was still running with
> > something like 25% battery remaining when he returned.
>
> So what you're actually up to is that a user should restart the phone
> and turn the radio off if he wants to find it running when he's back
> from a long business trip or something. Nice...
?
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists