[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006071041.49159.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:41:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"TuxOnIce-devel" <tuxonice-devel@...onice.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image.
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 20:04, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
...
> > So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB
> > (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)? Would it
> > be _that_ _much_ worse?
>
> No it wouldn't be much worse. But there will still be some lagginess,
> some delay, some sort of annoying disk activity compared to NO delay,
> NO lagginess, in short, you have your computer _exactly_ the way you
> left it when you left it when you hibernated. And the difference is
> noticeable.
Well, have you actually tried that?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists