[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100606184139.5505d2a5@fido5>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:41:39 -0700
From: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@...skialf.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: make sdhci work with ricoh mmc controller
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:37:32 +0300
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 19:11 -0400, Philip Langdale wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:28:50 +0300, Maxim Levitsky
> > <maximlevitsky@...il.com> wrote:
> > > The current way of disabling it is not well tested by vendor
> > > and has all kinds of bugs that show up on resume from ram/disk.
> > >
> > > Old way of disabling is still supported by
> > > continuing to use CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC.
> > >
> > > Based on
> > > 'http://list.drzeus.cx/pipermail/sdhci-devel/2007-December/002085.html'
> > > Most of the credit for this goes to Andrew de Quincey
> > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
> > > CC: Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@...skialf.net>
> > > CC: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
> >
> > ACK with one change to add a #define for the device ID.
> I am not sure about this.
> When I submitted a driver for xD part I was told that unless device is
> shared by several pieces of code, its not ok to add it to pci_ids.c.
> The device is I was told can be hardcoded in the driver.
> Nothing against changing it.
Ok, then leave it as is:
Acked-by: Philip Langdale <philipl@...rt.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c | 31
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |
> > > 3 ++- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 4 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c index 65483fd..c4bcaeb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.c
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > >
> > > #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
> > >
> > > @@ -84,7 +85,21 @@ static int ricoh_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip
> > > *chip) if (chip->pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_SAMSUNG
> > > || chip->pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_SONY)
> > > chip->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_CARD_NO_RESET;
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ricoh_mmc_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
> > > +{
> > > + slot->host->caps =
> > > + ((0x21 << SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_SHIFT)
> > > + & SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_MASK) |
> > >
> > > + ((0x21 << SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_SHIFT)
> > > + & SDHCI_CLOCK_BASE_MASK) |
> > > +
> > > + SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CLK_UNIT |
> > > + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
> > > + SDHCI_CAN_DO_SDMA;
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > As we discussed, highspeed works. Of course, sdhci never sets the
> > MMC highspeed flag so the cap is irrelevant. We'd need another
> > quirk to indicate highspeed MMC is supported.
> >
> > This can be done in a separate patch.
> Sure, but maybe we can enable this for SD/SDHC too?
Not sure what you mean. The proper SD interface reports the HISPD
cap already. Do you mean enabling high-speed MMC on a 'proper'
SDHCI controller. That's what Pierre didn't want to do blindly.
> >
> > > @@ -95,6 +110,14 @@ static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes
> > > sdhci_ricoh = { SDHCI_QUIRK_CLOCK_BEFORE_RESET,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_ricoh_mmc = {
> > > + .probe_slot = ricoh_mmc_probe_slot,
> > > + .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_32BIT_DMA_ADDR |
> > > + SDHCI_QUIRK_CLOCK_BEFORE_RESET |
> > > + SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_CARD_NO_RESET |
> > > + SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_ene_712 = {
> > > .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_SINGLE_POWER_WRITE |
> > > SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_DMA,
> > > @@ -374,6 +397,14 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[]
> > > __devinitdata = {
> > > },
> > >
> > > {
> > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
> > > + .device = 0x843,
> > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
> > > + .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID,
> > > + .driver_data =
> > > (kernel_ulong_t)&sdhci_ricoh_mmc,
> > > + },
> > > +
> > > + {
> >
> > It seems we generally want to add a #define for the device ID.
> > The ENE device below has one.
> >
> > > .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ENE,
> > > .device =
> > > PCI_DEVICE_ID_ENE_CB712_SD, .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > index c6d1bd8..483b78e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > @@ -1687,7 +1687,8 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > > host->version);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - caps = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
> > > + caps = (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS) ?
> > > host->caps :
> > > + sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
> > >
> > > if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_FORCE_DMA)
> > > host->flags |= SDHCI_USE_SDMA;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > index c846813..b1839a3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
> > > @@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> > > #define SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN (1<<25)
> > > /* Controller cannot support End Attribute in NOP ADMA
> > > descriptor */ #define
> > > SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_ENDATTR_IN_NOPDESC (1<<26) +/*
> > > Controller is missing device caps. Use caps provided by host */
> > > +#define SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS (1<<27)
> > > int irq; /* Device
> > > IRQ */ void __iomem * ioaddr; /*
> > > Mapped address */ @@ -292,6 +294,8 @@ struct sdhci_host {
> > >
> > > struct timer_list timer; /* Timer
> > > for timeouts */
> > > + unsigned int caps; /*
> > > Alternative capabilities */ +
> > > unsigned long private[0]
> > > ____cacheline_aligned; };
> >
> > --phil
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
>
>
--phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists