linux-kernel - Re: [BUG][PATCH]dma-coherent.c: error path bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Jun 2010 11:30:48 +0900
From:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	mitov@...p.bas.bg
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG][PATCH]dma-coherent.c: error path bug

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:53:04 +0300
Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The error path in dma_declare_coherent_memory() leaves 
> the pointer dev->dma_mem non completely initialized.
> 
> If allocation of dev->dma_mem succeeds, 
> but allocation of dev->dma_mem->bitmap fails
> dev->dma_mem is freed, but left non NULL
> and non completely initialized.
> 
> Either zero it after being freed (one liner patch), or assign to 
> dev->dma_mem only completely initialized structure (patch included).
> 
> Comments welcome.
> 
> Marin Mitov
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg>

Hmm, if dma_declare_coherent_memory() fails, the driver doesn't use
dev->dma_mem. So even if dev->dma_mem points to a freed memory, I'm
not sure that it causes a real problem. We could call this patch a
cleanup though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/