| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100607141103.GA9477@srcf.ucam.org> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:11:03 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> To: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@....de> Cc: ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: ThinkPad T400 : should kernel option "reboot=pci" be hard coded ? On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:22:21AM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > Since some kernel version (IIRC since 2.6.31) it is necessary to boot the > linux kernel with that option to prevent an extra 9 seconds delay during > reboot. > I found this tip on the LKML -and now I'm wondering whether this option should > be hard coded in the kernel sources b/c it seems to be necessary for current > kernels too. No, the best thing to do would be to figure out what changed to require the extra 9 seconds. Are you able to work out which the last kernel release without this timeout was? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists