[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1275928771.1645.572.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:39:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
akpm@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] mm: preemptibility -v3
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 18:36 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> writes:
>
> > This patch-set makes part of the mm a lot more preemptible. It converts
> > i_mmap_lock and anon_vma->lock to mutexes and makes mmu_gather fully
> > preemptible.
>
> How about performance measurements? mutexes still behave quite
> differently from spinlocks, especially under contention.
What's your favourite benchmark to stress i_mmap_mutex/anon_vma->lock?
a cache-hot kernel build didn't really show a difference..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists