[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100607182640.GL31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:26:41 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:00:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So please. Just make me a tree that has regression fixes _only_. I'm not
> AT ALL interested in "it is useful to report the gpu temp". If it was so
> useful, and if it was ready before the merge window, it should hav gone in
> then. That clearly wasn't the case, so it's not going in now either.
Ho-hum... Speaking of which, what about leak fixes? There's a long-standing
in-core inode leak in jffs2; basically, if you fail directory modification
in symlink() et.al., you get a leaked inode and whinge at umount. Found
after -rc1, had been there since all the way back (similar bug in creat()
had been fixed in 2003, mkdir()/mknod()/symlink() were not). Fix sits in
jffs2-fixes now...
I can simply pull jffs2-fixes into vfs for-next (I need it in there for
->evict_inode() series), but I'd obviously prefer to just rebase it after
it gets into mainline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists