[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilPVWvsgXkriz68lLl6e8Qslm_wMkHpkhEdWC3_@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:39:03 +0300
From: Dmytro Milinevskyy <milinevskyy@...il.com>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Cc: ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@...il.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>,
Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@...sung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Lukas Turek <8an@...ha12.net>,
Mark Hindley <mark@...dley.org.uk>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>,
Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin@...onical.com>,
Luca Verdesca <magooz@...ug.it>,
Shahar Or <shahar@...har-or.co.il>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ath5k][leds] Ability to disable leds support. If leds
support enabled do not force mac802.11 leds layer selection.
Pavel, thank you for the response here.
I agree with all your comments and will adjust the patch according to them.
I'm new to the submitting patches into the community and I appreciate
telling criticism so that in future I will not cause that much
troubles.
Regards,
-- Dima
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski@....org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 16:43 +0300, Dmytro Milinevskyy wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Here is the patch to disable ath5k leds support on build stage.
>> However if the leds support was enabled do not force selection of 802.11 leds layer.
>> Depency on LEDS_CLASS is kept.
>>
>> Suggestion given by Pavel Roskin and Bob Copeland applied.
>
> It's great that you did it. The patch is much clearer now. That makes
> smaller issues visible. Please don't be discouraged by the criticism,
> you are on the right track.
>
> First of all, your patch doesn't apply cleanly to the current
> wireless-testing because of formatting changes in Makefile. Please
> update.
>
>> +config ATH5K_LEDS
>> + tristate "Atheros 5xxx wireless cards LEDs support"
>> + depends on ATH5K
>> + select NEW_LEDS
>> + select LEDS_CLASS
>> + ---help---
>> + Atheros 5xxx LED support.
>
> "tristate" is wrong here. "tristate" would allow users select "m",
> which is wrong, since LED support is not a separate module. I think you
> want "bool" here.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ATH5K_LEDS
>> /*
>> * State for LED triggers
>> */
>> @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ struct ath5k_led
>> struct ath5k_softc *sc; /* driver state */
>> struct led_classdev led_dev; /* led classdev */
>> };
>> +#endif
>
> This shouldn't be needed. I'll rather see a structure that is not used
> in some cases than an extra pair of preprocessor conditionals.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/gpio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/gpio.c
>> index 64a27e7..9e757b3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/gpio.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> #include "debug.h"
>> #include "base.h"
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ATH5K_LEDS
>> /*
>> * Set led state
>> */
>> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ void ath5k_hw_set_ledstate(struct ath5k_hw *ah, unsigned int state)
>> else
>> AR5K_REG_ENABLE_BITS(ah, AR5K_PCICFG, led_5210);
>> }
>> +#endif
>
> I would just move that function to led.c (and don't forget to include
> reg.h). The Makefile should take care of the rest.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pavel Roskin
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists