[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100608090811.GA5949@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 05:08:11 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Do not call ->writepage[s] from direct reclaim
and use a_ops->writepages() where possible
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:02:19AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> seeky patterns. The second is that direct reclaim calling the filesystem
> splices two potentially deep call paths together and potentially overflows
> the stack on complex storage or filesystems. This series is an early draft
> at tackling both of these problems and is in three stages.
Btw, one more thing came up when I discussed the issue again with Dave
recently:
- we also need to care about ->releasepage. At least for XFS it
can end up in the same deep allocator chain as ->writepage because
it does all the extent state conversions, even if it doesn't
start I/O. I haven't managed yet to decode the ext4/btrfs codepaths
for ->releasepage yet to figure out how they release a page that
covers a delayed allocated or unwritten range.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists