[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100608205829.768C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:59:06 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed()
Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but
it should use while_each_thread().
It slightly improve the code readability.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 8 +++-----
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index b88172c..8376ad1 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -38,16 +38,14 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zone_scan_lock);
/*
* Is all threads of the target process nodes overlap ours?
*/
-static int has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk)
+static int has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p)
{
- struct task_struct *t;
+ struct task_struct *t = p;
- t = tsk;
do {
if (cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, t))
return 1;
- t = next_thread(t);
- } while (t != tsk);
+ } while_each_thread(p, t);
return 0;
}
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists